HomeDecisionsThe supplier decision

Decision Nº 01 · Procurement

A critical supplier raises prices by 12%.

Do you negotiate, move volume, find an alternative — or accept it?

Illustrative walkthrough Scenario numbers Procurement Manufacturing · Retail · Pharma
+12%

Tuesday, 09:12 — the letter lands. Your largest resin supplier moves list price, effective in thirty days.

09:12The letter: +12% on list price. ₹46 Cr of annual spend just moved.
09:40Finance runs it: −2.1 margin points on the affected lines if accepted.
10:05The contract's review clause: 21 days left to challenge — then it locks.

Negotiate — or accept it?

Four live choices. One answer owed.

01 · The situationScenario · Supplier +12%
Inbound price letterWatch it get mapped ↓

The situation: at 09:12 a letter lands — the largest resin supplier raises list price 12%, effective in 30 days. It touches 46 crore of annual spend, costs 2.1 margin points if accepted, and the contract's challenge window closes in 21 days. Negotiate — or accept it?

One trigger. Six numbers. Four choices.

That's the whole decision, mapped — weighed at once against your rules. No estate-wide data programme, no dashboard sprawl. Only what this call needs.

02 · The mapLinked 00/10
Decision anatomy · live graphOnly what this call needs

The map: the +12% trigger links to six numbers — spend exposure, margin impact, the 21-day review clause, two qualified alternates at +4% and +6%, switching cost of 0.8 crore over 60 days, five weeks of inventory cover — and four live choices: negotiate, move volume, qualify a third source, accept. One graph resolves them together.

03 · The playbook

The rules & judgment, written down.

R1Never open a negotiation without a fallback we could actually execute.
R2A-class materials keep two qualified alternates warm at all times.
R3Accept an increase only if at least 60% passes through to price within the quarter.
R4Relationship counts: this supplier has saved the line twice. Fight the number, not the partner.

This is judgment your best people already carry. Written into the decision, it works on every letter — not just the ones they happen to see.

04 · The call

Twenty-nine days to spare.

Decisome // Recommendation Scenario: supplier +12% 88
01

Counter at +5% inside the review window — the benchmark and your alternates make it credible.

Contract window · 21 daysAlternate landed cost
02

Move 20% of volume to the first alternate now — leverage the supplier can see, not just hear.

Qualified alternatesSwitching lead · 60 days
03

Extend inventory cover to 8 weeks before talks open.

Inventory coverEffective in 30 days
04

Open qualification on a third source — for next year's letter, not this one.

A-class sourcing ruleLeverage reset
Challenge any line — it shows its work. Choices weighed: 4 // Rules applied: 4
Resolved —
+12% became +4.8%
Recommendation engineExplainable by construction

The call, confidence 88: counter at +5% inside the review window; move 20% of volume to the first alternate now; extend inventory cover to 8 weeks; open qualification on a third source. Resolved — +12% became +4.8%.

05 · After the call

The decision leaves the room.

Day 1

Procurement lead sends the counter — +5%, with the benchmark pack attached.

Day 2

Planner places the alternate purchase orders; cover lifted to 8 weeks.

Week 2

Category manager opens third-source qualification for next year's letter.

Next

Landed cost tracked weekly against plan. Learned: this supplier moves when volume visibly moves.

Illustrative follow-through · scenario data

Is this your decision — or close to it?

Bring Us This Decision → Find more decisions